when i was much younger, i used to experience a blackout where i lived. i only found out later that it was an island-wide blackout and everyone was out of power for a couple of hours. as children, we were thrilled by this unexpected turn of events in that mundane week day. instead of our usual routine of having to complete a copious and inhumane amount of homework that evening, we were given permission to shine our torches across to the next building. now, on a normal day, this act would warrant a police complaint and possible verbal abuse from our neighbours, but on that day, it was classified as a gallant (albeit pathetic) attempt at providing light for our neighbours across the street. we had fun shouting across to the neighbourhood kids. i can’t remember what we shouted but it was possibly along the lines of how dark it was and how we couldn’t watch tv. it was an unusual event, that blackout. after all, our country prided ourselves as being fiercely luminous whatever time of the day.
we are experiencing another virtual blackout today. one that is led by wikipedia this time. apparently, wordpress got the memo and decided to do something similar with their freshly pressed blogs. i had logged on this morning hoping to garner some intellectual stimulation from the blogs when i found out all of them were censored. my first thought was, “knarts, what is wordpress coming to? why are graphic content becoming freshly pressed?” and then i remembered the wikipedia blackout and i nodded my head in comprehension.
i understand where the protests are going with this. but if one were to be brutally honest, what are the chances that this mere 24 hours blackout by wikipedia would reap anything else other than inconvenience for and complaints from people (me) who are too lazy to do real research on their own? it seems a bit superfluous as well. it’s like having anti-animal abuse activists abusing animals to prove their cause. plus i heard we can still access wikipedia on our phones. nonetheless, i do support and appreciate the free internet and i am against anything that goes against that. laws and legislations that go against the free internet illustrates egocentricity at its finest. i do not believe in keeping content only eligible to a certain group of people. there must be a culture of sharing and learning from one another. and the internet is one of the best places to do so.
i wouldn’t do my protest in the form of blackouts though. maybe i should place a mat in front of the congress.
xx b